Close Menu
Rusk, Wadlin, Heppner & Martuscello, LLP
Protect Your Rights: Call us for a FREE
Personal Injury Consultation

Pendente Lite Support Not Barred by Prenuptial Agreement

form-for-prenuptial-agreement

Prenuptial agreements can be an excellent way to limit the number of issues that a couple needs to litigate in a divorce, and to control the existence or amount of spousal support to be paid after the couple parts ways. However, a prenuptial agreement cannot be effective in protecting spouses from litigation where the agreement itself failed to include all critical provisions. A recent divorce case before the New York Appellate Division titled Davis v. Davis is an example of the prolonged litigation that can result from a poorly-drafted prenuptial agreement, and the importance of hiring thorough, knowledgeable, and detail-oriented New York family law attorneys.

The Davis case centered on a couple who had signed a valid prenuptial agreement when they were married in 2013. The agreement stated that both parties waived the right to spousal maintenance, should the couple get a divorce. The husband filed for divorce in 2015. Subsequently, his wife filed a motion for spousal support during the pendency of the divorce action itself, a form of support known as “pendente lite” maintenance, and also filed a motion for interim attorneys’ fees. The trial court granted the wife’s motion, awarding pendente lite maintenance and attorneys’ fees to the wife. When the husband failed to make the ordered support payments, the wife filed a motion to hold the husband in contempt of court. The court again ordered the husband to issue the pendente lite payments the judge had previously awarded to the wife.

The husband contested the award of pendente lite maintenance and attorneys’ fees to his wife, arguing that the prenuptial agreement the spouses had signed prevented either spouse from seeking spousal support in the event of a divorce. The Appellate Division noted in its opinion that the couple’s prenuptial agreement did not specifically state that the spouses waived the right to seek pendente lite maintenance or other support in the interim of filing for and obtaining a divorce. As a result, the Appellate Division found the award of pendente lite maintenance justified under the law and facts of the case, since the prenuptial agreement didn’t apply to that form of maintenance, and the disparity between the parties’ income was great enough to warrant an award of maintenance.

If you are considering creating a prenuptial agreement before your New York marriage, seek seasoned and effective legal counsel by contacting the Hudson Valley family law attorneys at Rusk, Wadlin, Heppner & Martuscello, LLP for a consultation, in Kingston at 845-331-4100 or in Marlboro at 845-236-4411.

Ulster County Lawyers

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Kingston Office

255 Fair Street, P.O. Box 3356
Kingston, New York 12402

Phone: 845-331-4100
Fax: 845-331-6930

Marlboro Office

1390 Route 9W, P.O. Box 727
Marlboro, NY 12542

Phone: 845-236-4411
Fax: 845-236-3190

Rusk, Wadlin, Heppner & Martuscello, LLP, is located in Kingston, NY and Marlboro, NY and serves clients in and around Ulster County as well as parts of Orange, Dutchess, Columbia and Greene Counties as well as many surrounding areas.

Get Driving Directions

Attorney Advertisement

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

No content on this site may be reused in any fashion without written permission from www.RWHM.com

Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2015 - 2017 Rusk, Wadlin, Heppner & Martuscello, LLP. All rights reserved.
Custom WebShop™ law firm website design by NextClient.com.

Contact Form Tab